karlunity Posted June 16, 2014 Report Share Posted June 16, 2014 http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/jun/16/supreme-court-rules-stricter-scrutiny-gun-purchase/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FC Posted June 17, 2014 Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 Karl, the page isn't working. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Hess Posted June 17, 2014 Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 I fixed the link. Space at the end. Basically, they threw a small bone to the left. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
karlunity Posted June 17, 2014 Author Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 Thank you It may be a small bone. But the question arises what part of "Shall NOT be infringed" don't they understand? Karl Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacrat Posted June 18, 2014 Report Share Posted June 18, 2014 Thank you It may be a small bone. But the question arises what part of "Shall NOT be infringed" don't they understand? Karl Dude, they understand it, but since they don't agree with it. They just take it upon themselves to ignore it. “No piece of information is more important under federal firearms law than the identity of a gun’s purchaser — the person who acquires a gun as a result of a transaction with a licensed dealer,” Justice Elena Kagan wrote in the majority opinion. Yet they refuse to hear cases regarding the constitutionality of the LAWS themselves. Only ancillary cases. I call it the 2A SCOTUS 2step. JM2c Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.