Should I Not Sporterize This Mauser?
#1
Posted 06 January 2012 - 03:33 PM
My goal in the trade was to build a scout rifle and I have no interest in restoring the Mauser but I don't want to ruin any possibility of someone restoring it in the future. So what say you folks? Could this rifle be enough of an interest for a collector or is it degraded enough to go ahead and sporterize it?
#2
Posted 06 January 2012 - 04:34 PM
The museums already have their own.
#3
Posted 06 January 2012 - 08:12 PM
#4
Posted 06 January 2012 - 08:19 PM
Like Ken said, it's your gun. Do what you want with it.
#5
Posted 06 January 2012 - 09:20 PM
#6
Posted 06 January 2012 - 09:53 PM
My goal in the trade was to build a scout rifle and I have no interest in restoring the Mauser but I don't want to ruin any possibility of someone restoring it in the future.
Since your only interest is as a sporter and the collector value is already been ruined. Go for it. It is yours to do with as you see fit.
If on the other hand it was still a complete 94 carbine. It would have much more value as a collectable and you could sell it to someone for their collection and use the increased funds for your sporter and come out ahead.
It's not always about being a purist. A little common sense goes a long way, being as how it is so uncommon nowadays. In my younger and less enlightened days I turned $600 dollar rifles into $200 rifles by supposedly improving them into sporters.
Now I've learned to check before I chop.
#7
Posted 07 January 2012 - 05:48 PM
#8
Posted 17 February 2012 - 09:57 PM
I think the original M94 carbine barrels were a tad short to be legal in the US, and when they were first imported the importer had to weld an extension piece to the end of the barrel.
Now, I believe, they are legal without the extension piece. But if you sporterize it and it is no longer in C&R form, wouldn't the short barrel be a problem?
#9
Posted 18 February 2012 - 09:50 PM
Is there a legal issue to be considered?
I think the original M94 carbine barrels were a tad short to be legal in the US, and when they were first imported the importer had to weld an extension piece to the end of the barrel.
Now, I believe, they are legal without the extension piece. But if you sporterize it and it is no longer in C&R form, wouldn't the short barrel be a problem?
Not a chance I would be willing to take with the BATF myself.
Being a 94, one could possibly trade it for a couple M38s in decent shape. When I bought my 94 it was $300 and the M38s were going for less than $150. I trimmed an M38 back to 20", added a Boyd's walnut stock which I took a lot of wood off of and D/T'd a TC Contender base to the last barrel step and it was a gem handling and shooting.
#10
Posted 24 February 2012 - 10:45 AM
#11
Posted 24 February 2012 - 01:53 PM
Don
#12
Posted 24 February 2012 - 10:50 PM
#13
Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:16 PM
Are you sure it had length added to it? I've never seen that but, I have seen many that have had the muzzle counterbored as a means of repairing a bad crown.Minimum legal rifle barrel length is 16 inches with an overall rifle length of 26 inches. With that in mind, I had a 94 swede that had the added on 1/2" of barrel and it was a tack driver at 100 yards. I think either would be great to have. I'm down to five now. I sent two to my brother.
#14
Posted 05 March 2012 - 08:23 PM
Are you sure it had length added to it? I've never seen that but, I have seen many that have had the muzzle counterbored as a means of repairing a bad crown.
I know mine was an add-on as the seam was apparent and the extension was unblued but had a patina that made it not so garish as bare metal. Looking into the end of it, it gave the appearance of having been counterbored because the bore of the extension was ocnsiderably larger than the actual rifle bore.
#15
Posted 12 March 2012 - 06:41 PM
http://findarticles....ag=content;col1
Like I said - not necessarily gospel, as he may be repeating the same stuff I have heard for many years but a quick measure of an original will tell if there is enough barrel to lop a bit off to get to a nice crown. I wouldn't bet the crown is damaged at all anyway as the extension provided a fair amount of protection from nicks and dings, while it may not protect it from cleaning rod wear.
So, what's the status of this project? Anything to take pictures of yet?
#16
Posted 12 March 2012 - 10:36 PM
http://www.northcape...om/swmauser.htm
This link lists the 94 barrel length as 449mm (17.7"): (449 / 25.4 = 17.677 ~ 17.7)
http://www.gotavapen...e/rifles_se.htm
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










