Pennsylvania Judge: Muslims Allowed To Attack People For Insulting Mohammad
Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:42 AM
Posted 26 February 2012 - 10:56 AM
"Judge Martin threw the case out on the grounds that Elbayomy was obligated to attack Perce because of his culture and religion. Judge Martin stated that the First Amendment of the Constitution does not permit people to provoke other people. He also called Perce, the plaintiff in the case, a "doofus." In effect, Perce was the perpetrator of the assault, in Judge Martin's view, and Elbayomy the innocent. The Sharia law that the Muslim attacker followed trumped the First Amendment."...........
The judge also stated that he was a Muslim as well. He should have recused himself at the very least. I hope that as a result of this ruling he not only forfeits his seat on the bench, but his privilage to practice law all together.
Posted 26 February 2012 - 12:53 PM
Posted 26 February 2012 - 09:08 PM
Posted 27 February 2012 - 01:52 PM
The stuff happening to this country is just unbelievable!
My guess is the judge believes Allah will reward him with a few extra cherries. At least there are a few states, Arizona being one. A recall movement would have started by now.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users