Jump to content
Military Firearm Restoration Corner

z1r

Members
  • Posts

    1,753
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by z1r

  1. My son shot my 9.5" Single Six and loved the long barrel. So, given his penchant for longer barrels, I rebarreled his single six using a 10/22 barrel that I shortened, threaded, indexed the sight, cut a new forcing cone, and drilled and tapped for the ejector rod housing.  Finished out at 11.5" of pure fun.

     

    I didn't take any pics of the single six project but these pics of my rebarreling a 45 Vaquero are essentially the same:

     

    Start by making a barrel bush for the vise out of 1.75" aluminum bar stock.

    sgTJESc.jpg

    Bore the hole to appropriate size for the barrel, then split the bushing.

    7ciSqc2.jpg

    wchFfxl.jpg

    Make inserts for the action wrench to fit the frame:

    RBrLPYs.jpg

    AetvhYk.jpg

    Measure to get your shank length to establish proper cylinder gap:

    C1ty987.jpg

    After timing sight, cut new forcing cone and trim shank to achieve .002" cylinder gap.

    Vimw3Kb.jpg

    End result:

    NCIayRr.jpg

     

     

    Single Six.jpg

  2. Used to be mine too, spent most weekends in that area. I remember when there was only one traffic light in town, on Main St. And the Cinema in town used a Carbon Arc projector.  The Nimitz Museum has grown so much.  A fun visit, as is Texas Jacks.

  3. When we were young, and I mean, high school young, my buddy's grandmaw and uncle used to make wine out of mustang grapes grown in Fredericksburg. Dang good stuff. I always wanted to brew my own but alas, I don't drink enough anymore to warrant the effort.

  4. So, I cut off the handle and reattached it.  The root was deformed by the previous hack so, it is as straight as I can get it without rebuilding the root entirely.  Not doing that for free.

    But, at least it isn't pockmarked and will clear a low scope. And, looks decent.

     

    Resized_20220312_212422.jpeg

  5. All too frequently, I see bolts like this on sporters:

     

    A buddy picked this up. I helped him replace the 8x57 barrel with a .308.  But this bolt handle has got to go.  Not only is the void so huge that the handle is about to fall off, it sticks out so far, that it won't clear a scope without high rings.  Gonna cut it off and weld it back on correctly so he won't have to alter the stock.

     

    I wonder who in the world thinks that a handle like this is ok?  Amazes me that people would settle for this.

    IMG_4870.JPG

    IMG_4871.JPG

  6. Hey guys. Looks like the .32 isn't allowed. At least it is not one of the listed cartridges. Someone ought to check to see if any straightwall cartridge will qualify or only those listed. the .327 Federal has more energy than the 38 Special which is listed. Though it wouldn't be something you'd want to try in a mauser.

     

    Of those cartridges listed, the .375 Win, .38-55, and .444 Marlin would require the least amount of effort. The former two are easy enough if you are ok with a single loader. You can get them to feed but not readily. The .444 except for the rim is not too unlike an '06 is shape. But the stubby length and short bullets will still make feeding fun. It is doable though. Just a matter of how many man hours you want to invest.

     

    To the original question. A .32-40 might be considered a straight walled case. Like the .444, it has taper and practically no neck, or perhaps shoulder is a better word.

     

    A '91 Argentine magazine or something similar would allow at least three cartridges and would probably help feeding considerably.

  7. AZ,

     

    i would look seriously at building that 375 Ruger. I have a .376 Steyr as well as the H&H, the Ruger, to me, is no more difficult to shoot nor do I notice any appreciable increase in recoil. The only reason I didn't build myself one was because I already have the Steyr and H&H.

     

    I like this case design so much that instead of a .338 Win Mag I am going to neck the .375 case down to .338. Performance will be just behind the 330 Dakota.

     

    Whatcha planning on huntting with your .375 Ken?

  8. AZ,

    I don't want to steer you away from the Ruger but here's something to consider.

     

    A while back, I bought an FN 375 length trigger guard from another member here. I then borrowed a buddies Mark X 375 H&H and the trigger guard I purchased fit the Mark X like a glove.

     

    What this told me is, contrary to what I have heard on the web, it is common practice by Mauser manufacturers (FN and Zastava for certain) to open up a standard length action to accommodate the 375 H&H.

     

    I have another 375 blank that is going to become a 375 H&H eventually.

     

    I have an interarms in .375 H&H and I will say this, FN, then Zastava, made a mistake in taking so much material out of the bottom lug. First, when FN went to the commercial triggerguard for the '06 length cartridges, they for some unknown and totally unneccessary reason moved the rear of the mag box forward. Compare a commerecial FN unit to a Milsurp box and you will see. Thus, since the FN H&H length bottom metal is nothing more than an extended '06 unit, you see that it requires moving the feed ramp even further forward than required. No way to avoid removing material from the feed ramp when building an H&H on a std length Mauser. However, less is to be prefered.

     

     

    Most folks don't shoot the .375 Whitworths much seeing as they have become something of a collector's item and FN made darn few so to date I haven't heard of any catastrophic failures. I know I will continue to shoot mine. But, if building from scratch, I'd pick the .375 Ruger in a heart beat. The only real advantage the H&H has would be if one was Africa bound and ammo avalability was an issue. The .375 Ruger case capacity exceeds that of the H&H so unless you load the H&H to very high pressures you will not see a few hundred fps advantage. Unlike the .376 which almost matches the H&H performance, the Ruger exceeds the H&H.

     

    Nice rifle Ken!

  9. Built a few 375 Rugers in the last year or so and was so impressed with both the cartridge & case that I just knew that it wouldn't be long before a 416 Would be in the works.

     

    Here is a 416 Ruger next to a Whitworth .375 H&H barreled action. The 416 barrel has a quicker taper just ahead of the receiver ring and the barrel is a bit thinner than the. 375. This allows for a 26" barrel that balances the same as the Whitworth but is more than a 1/2 lb lighter. Sights, barrel band, recoil lug still to come.

    IMG_3260_zps3c5a76dc.jpg


    a3bc82a0-5690-491b-bb3c-37981ab4a3a6_zps

     

    Test fired it yesterday in a Houge Overmolded stock. Recoil was brisk but very managable. It will be stocked in walnut so that the weight w/o scope will be just under 8 lbs.

  10. well - the rim goes all the way to the breech face now - I wasn't kidding - it was a really good game. I think I'll sit this one in my project locker until I get my lathe back. Thanks for the imput guys. 300win actually sounds like a good choice.

     

    If the rim is about flush with the breech then you need about a thread and a half worth of setting teh barrel back. Not undoable.

     

    If not, you might look into a .30-06 AI. Might be close.

×
×
  • Create New...