How The Clintons Will Destroy John Mccain

[karlunity]

http://www.vietnamveteransagainstjohnmccain.com/

 

HOW THE CLINTONS WILL DESTROY JOHN MCCAIN

 

Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler

 

Thursday, 31 January 2008

 

The number of fellow Senators who think John McCain is psychologically unstable is large. Some will admit it publicly, like Thad Cochran who says, "The thought of his being president sends a cold chill down my spine."

 

Others relate times when McCain screamed four-letter obscenities right in their faces in the Senate cloak room, like Dick Shelby, Rick Santorum, or Jim Inhofe. "The man is unhinged," one Senator told me. "He is frighteningly unfit to be Commander-in-Chief."

 

That John McCain is clinically nuts is scary enough. What worries a small group of GOP Senators and Congressmen even more is a deep and dark skeletal secret in McCain's glorified past to which they are privy, and which the Clintons will use to blackmail him.

 

They have been having discussions with a Russian whom we'll call "T" for Translator. T's father was the Soviet military intelligence officer who ran the "Hanoi Hilton" prison holding captured Americans during the Vietnam War. One of those prisoners was John McCain.

 

The GRU -- Glavnoje Razvedyvatel'noje Upravlenije or Main Intelligence Directorate of the Soviet (now Russian) Armed Forces - operated the entire North Vietnamese prison system holding American prisoners of war. GRU officers, all of whom were Russians, oversaw the interrogation of every American POW.

 

The interrogations themselves were conducted by Vietnamese who spoke some English. After each interrogation session, which could often include torturing the prisoners at the direction of the GRU officers, the Vietnamese interrogator would write a report of the session - in Vietnamese.

 

These reports had to be translated into Russian. T, a bright teenager living in the GRU compound in Hanoi, had become fluent in Vietnamese, and ended up translating many of the reports and interrogators' notes.

 

John McCain, flying his A-4 Skyhawk, was shot down over Hanoi on October 26, 1967. Badly injured from the ejection, he was beaten and abused by his captors. In July, 1968, his father, US Navy Admiral J. S. McCain, was made CINCPAC, Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Command, commander of all US military forces in the Vietnam theatre. Upon learning this, the Vietnamese offered - according to McCain - to release him.

 

McCain claims he refused, because he demanded all American POWs captured before him be released as well. He thus remained a prisoner when he could have gone home, and was subjected to constant brutal beatings and torture for years: that is the source of the "war-hero" saga making McCain a greater war-hero than any other American POW. Yet the offer of release would had to have been approved by the GRU overseers of the North Vietnamese - and T does not recall any such offer being made. T admits, however, that this took place before McCain was transferred to Hoa Loa prison, nicknamed the "Hanoi Hilton" by the POWs. T had only direct knowledge of what happened at Hoa Loa, and not the other prisons, where T's father was in charge.

 

McCain was kept at the Hanoi Hilton from December 1969 until his release, along with all the remaining POWs, in March of 1973. During this time, T translated all the Vietnamese interrogators' notes and reports regarding John McCain.

 

According to T, they reveal that McCain had made an "accommodation" with his captors, and in exchange, T's father saw that he was provided with an apartment in Hanoi and the services of two prostitutes. Upon returning to his prison cell, he would say he had been held in solitary confinement. That may be why so many of his fellow prisoners said later they saw so little of him at Hoa Loa.

 

The notes and reports written in Vietnamese were sent to Moscow, where T was a now a college student, for T's translation into Russian, then placed into GRU archives. That's where they stayed until 1991. Late that year, as the Soviet Union was collapsing, the CIA and the GRU made a deal for a document swap.

 

All of what it involved, T doesn't know. What T's father, by now retired but still with substantial contacts within the GRU, did learn (and thus T learned) was that the swap included all of T's translations.

 

In other words, the CIA has in its possession the notes and reports of John McCain's interrogators at the Hanoi Hilton, in both the original Vietnamese and translated Russian, showing collaboration with his Communist captors.

 

Allegations of this nature have been made over the years, many by Vietnam veterans. There is an even an organization, Vietnam Veterans Against McCain. But they are based on suspicions and circumstantial claims. There has never been any hard direct evidence. What T says the CIA has is such evidence. Its release would destroy McCain. The threat of it's release could force McCain to take a fall, blow the election and lose on purpose. And just who do you suppose would know what the CIA has and work with them to release it?

 

Someone who has been a CIA asset since he was recruited by London station chief Cord Meyer while a student at Oxford in 1968?

 

(Back in the 90s years after he retired, if Cord drank a little too much Scotch, he would laugh derisively at those conspiratorialists who accused Bill Clinton of being connected with the KGB.

 

"They all darkly point to Bill's participation in anti-war peace conferences in Stockholm and Oslo, and his trip to Leningrad, Moscow, and Prague while he was at Oxford. 'Who could have paid for this?', they ask. 'It had to be the KGB!' they claim." Cord would shake his head. "What rot - we paid for it. We recruited Bill the first week he was at Oxford. Bill's been an asset of The Three Bad Words ever since." Cord passed on in 2001.)

 

The small group of Senators and Congressmen who have been briefed by T have been unable to confirm with the CIA any details of its document swap with the GRU beyond an admission that such a swap "may have happened." They are very nervous about pursuing the matter any further.

 

The Clintons are not nervous. They are utterly ruthless, and have buddies at Langley all too happy to help them.

 

It has been noted many times here in To The Point that while most folks think the CIA is a right-wing outfit, it is not. The CIA has been dominated by left-wing hyper-liberals for years.

 

The CIA is a left-wing, liberal outfit, and it's main job for some time now is not attacking America's enemies but conservatives in general and George W. Bush in particular. The story is best told by friend, Ken Timmerman in his new book Shadow Warriors.

 

When the time is right, the Clintons will see to the leaking of the GRU archives on McCain to the media. Bet on it, just as you can bet they'll follow it up with media disclosures of the lady lobbyists in Washington having adulterous affairs with McCain. (There are at least three of them; I know the name of one but I'm not going to put it in writing.)

 

Maybe McCain will try to fight back by confirming Hillary's well-known bisexuality and her lesbian affair with her beautiful assistant, Huma Abedin. Google "Hillary" and "Huma Abedin" and you'll get almost 6,000 hits. Turns out Huma is a Moslem who grew up in Saudi Arabia and is strongly suspected of working for Saudi intelligence.

 

Or maybe he'll capitulate to Clinton blackmail. You never can tell what a psychologically unstable guy will do.

 

And that last point is why - be prepared for this, folks - I would not in any circumstances vote for John McCain, not if either Hillary or Obama were the alternative. Evil is safer than crazy. Leftie amateur inexperience is safer than crazy. So I agree with Ann Coulter who says:

 

"I'd rather deal with President Hillary than with President McCain. With Hillary, we'll get the same ruinous liberal policies with none of the responsibility."

 

How in the world can the Republican Party get saddled with a nutcase whack-job who knows nothing about economics, is so anti-capitalist he uses "profit" as a term of derision, has never run a business or had any job outside of government, will raise taxes, is so stupid that he believes "stopping global warming" is worth destroying the American economy, won't drill ANWR, won't appoint strict constructionist justices, won't protect marriage, will give amnesty to 20 million illegal aliens, is beloved by the New York Times, and lives in a delusionary world of vanity and rage? Rush is right. A McCain presidency will be the destruction of the Republican Party. It needs to be rebuilt, not wiped out with the field clear for the fascists of the left to consolidate power and eliminate freedom.

 

And maybe the only way to rebuild it is in dedicated impassioned opposition to a Clinton White House. That should be the subject of Ann Coulter's next book. I've already got the title for her. Her last book was 'If Democrats Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans'.

 

Ann needs to now write this book: 'If Republicans Had Any Brains, They'd Be Republicans'.

 

[A Yogi Berra note. There still is a chance for Romney, the last remaining hope. If he can win enough delegates on Super Tuesday next week, combined with Huckabee winning Georgia and other southern states, it may still be possible for McCain to end up with only a plurality of delegates, not a majority, at the end of primary season. An open convention is still possible, during which Republicans could come to their senses. It's not over until it's over.]

 

 

What do you think ?

karl

 

[AzRednek]

The dirt will fly Clintons way as well. Secret Services employees have already complained about Hillary's temper. There was a well publicized incident of her tossing an ash tray at Bill and Secret Services had to get physically involved to control her.

 

Well known to Arizonans is McCain's wife walking away from serious drug and fraud charges that would have put anybody else away for years. I expect Dems will use it against McCain.

[roscoedoh]

Would you trust a politician that didn't have any dirt on him?

[AzRednek]

Would you trust a politician that didn't have any dirt on him?

 

I would have a bad feeling if an opponent had dirt and didn't use it. It would mean to me the other side also has it's own dirt and a deal was struck.

 

[Dr.Hess]

From: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=56177

 

ELECTION 2008

John McCain funded by Soros since 2001

Candidate's Reform Institute also accepted funds from Teresa Kerry

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted: February 12, 2008

1:00 am Eastern

 

By Jerome R. Corsi

© 2008 WorldNetDaily

 

As Sen. John McCain assumes the GOP front-runner mantle, his long-standing, but little-noticed association with left-wing donors such as George Soros and Teresa Heinz Kerry is receiving new attention among his Republican critics.

 

In 2001, McCain founded the Alexandria, Va.-based Reform Institute as a vehicle to receive funding from George Soros' Open Society Institute and Teresa Heinz Kerry's Tides Foundation and several other prominent non-profit organizations.

 

McCain used the institute to promote his political agenda and provide compensation to key campaign operatives between elections.

 

In 2006, the Arizona senator was forced to sever his formal ties with the Reform Institute after a controversial $200,000 contribution from Cablevision came to light. McCain solicited the donation for the Reform Institute using his membership on the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. In a letter to the Federal Communications Commission, he supported Cablevision's push to introduce the more profitable al la carte pricing, rather than packages of TV programming.

 

Yet, the Reform Institute still employs the McCain campaign's Hispanic outreach director, Juan Hernandez, as a senior fellow of its Comprehensive Immigration Reform Initiative.

 

As WND reported, Hernandez serves as a non-paid volunteer for the McCain campaign. A dual Mexican-U.S. citizen, he was a member of former President Vicente Fox's cabinet, representing an estimate 24 million Mexicans living abroad. Hernandez, with a "Mexico first" message, has argued aggressively against building a fence on the Mexican border, insisting the frontier needed to remain wide open so illegal immigrants could easily enter the U.S.

 

The July 6, 2001, homepage of the Reform Institute archived on the Internet lists founder McCain as chairman of the group's advisory committee.

 

Prominent senior officials on the McCain 2008 presidential campaign staff found generously paid positions at the Reform Institute following the senator's unsuccessful run for the White House in 2000.

 

Rick Davis, McCain's current campaign manager, was paid $110,000 a year by the Reform Institute for a consulting position, according to the group's 2003 Form 990 filing with the IRS.

 

In 2004, Davis advanced to the position of Reform Institute president, with an annual salary of $120,000, according to the group's 2004 Form 990.

 

In 2005, Davis remained president, but his salary dropped back to $45,000 a year, with a time commitment of five hours per week, according the 2005 Form 990.

 

Carla Eudy, a senior advisor on McCain's 2008 presidential campaign who until recently headed fundraising, was paid $177,885 in 2005 to serve as the Reform Institute's secretary-treasurer.

 

Other McCain presidential campaign staffers who have found employment at the Reform Institute include Trevor Potter, McCain's 2000 legal counsel, and Crystal Benton, the senator's former press secretary, who served as institute's communications director in 2005 for an annual salary of $52,083.

 

The Reform Institute regularly has supported McCain in various legislative efforts, including on campaign finance reform, global warming and "comprehensive immigration reform," all efforts widely opposed by many in the party's conservative base.

 

Arianna Huffington, syndicated columnist and creator of the HuffingtonPost.com, has served on the Reform Institute's advisory committee since the group's inception.

 

According to FrontPage Magazine, Teresa Heinz Kerry has provided more than $4 million to the Tides Foundation, a non-profit organization founded by anti-war activist Drummond Pike in 1976 with a history of funding causes such as abortion, homosexual-rights activism and open borders.

 

Financial contributors while McCain was chairman of the Reform Institute also have included the Educational Foundation of America, a group that supports abortion and opposes drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve.

 

The Soros-Kerry funding connection with McCain was first exposed by Ed Morrissey at the Captains Quarters blog in 2005.

 

Subsequently, David Horowitz's DiscoverTheNetworks.org website and Michelle Malkin's blog gave renewed attention to the Reform Institute's funding ties.

 

With Soros funding both "candidates," we're screwed either way.

[Doble Troble]

Here's a response to Wheeler's article.

[Racepres]

And we should believe whatever drivel Hanoi Jane [if ever there was a person deserving the "C" word] has to offer also?? Even what was shown to us by the obviously unbiased media!! $0.02.. MV

[724wd]

Here's a response to Wheeler's article.

still don't like him... COME ON, HUCK!

[karlunity]

Thanks for the rebuttal DT.

 

I still don't like Little Mac's politics but I am glad you cleared the air on his war record.

 

Karl

[flaco]

Who needs the Clintons to bash McCain when his "conservative" brothers are doing it for them?

 

Texas Republican donors financed a whole campaign that brought a new phrase into the English language lexicon: "Swift Boating."

 

Who remembers John Kerry?

 

This is exactly the same kind of bullsh*t.

 

Except they're targeting their own.

 

Shame on them and anyone who believes this twaddle.

 

Although the idea of stiff old McCain lounging around with a couple of hookers is sort of charming.

 

LOL.

 

flaco

 

BTW... While McCain has created a reputation as an independent, for the most part he's voted the Bush party line.

 

 

 

 

[karlunity]

Unlike the "left" who as a rule vote their wallet or personal comfort, we on the right are idealists.

 

Therefore, we don't unthinking vote "party line" .

 

We leave that to the comrades on the left.

 

Karl

[flaco]

Surely you jest, Karl?

 

George W's first term?

 

Every Republican in Congress voted the Party Line.

 

Zero vetos.

 

As it turns out, he's lived up to his critics: He'll go down in history as the worst president ever.

 

Do you see an end to the crisis caused by deregulated mortgage markets?

 

flaco

[karlunity]

"Do you see an end to the crisis caused by deregulated mortgage markets?["

 

As to the mortgage market, I recall radio adds saying " no points..no money down..bad credit..no credit...no problem!"

Let the lenders eat the loans...no bail outs..or Golden parachutes..When the Hippy and I applied for our home loan, they practically had the FBI..the CIA..and the Special Branch run background checks and that was with a VA guarantee and 20 year work records and at 10 % . We played by the rules so should everyone else.

I think these loans were made KNOWING many would default but the banks counted on Ole Uncle to bail them out..well. sorry about that.

 

]

As it turns out, he's lived up to his critics: He'll go down in history as the worst president ever

Nope.

 

The worst president ever???

That has to be Carter.

20 percent interest rate...NO-Gas and the hostages in Iran.

 

Every Republican in Congress voted the Party Line.

 

I agree about the Pols in Congress most of them do vote party line which is why people like Keyes NEVER get the party support they need to win office. The GOP did overspend, they acted like LBJ on payday, which is one of the reasons that the Dems won a lot of seats.

 

When I speak of "Idealists" In most cases I am referring to the voters not the pols.

 

Karl

[FC]

The Carter era was an absolutely horrible time to be an American. I remember it as a time where we were truly poor (by American standards). You'd get a raise, then a few months later, you needed another raise just to keep up with the horrible inflation. When else did it take two or three families getting together to be able to afford a house? Nixon and Ford were also horrible, but Carter took the cake.